Response to Monday's ExchangeEveryDay on Erica Jong's Wall Street Journal article was swift and strong. I have excerpted a few of the comments below to convey the thrust of their concerns. These expressions make me realize it is time to again spell out the purposes of ExchangeEveryDay:
Dr. Alice Sterling Honig, Syracuse University:
YES!!!! There are rules!!! Authoritative parenting works best. Permissive and authoritarian parenting result in children with far more difficulties. YES!!!! The attachment literature has powerful news for us all!!! Meeting baby's distress needs promptly and effectively and providing lots of cuddling that first year are critical for the development of secure attachment to a caregiver. Insecure babies grow up to be bullies in the research literature, or else victims of bullies or lacking in empathy! So please do NOT print this kind of blurb when we have superb research showing how important quality caregiving is, whether papa or grandma or mom raises the little one. You are right, of course, to note how few of the glowing reports tell about how the glitterati can best choose a nurturing and tuned-in nanny!
Deborah, Deb's 2nd home, Fresno, California:
I am unsure about your reasoning behind printing this controversial piece. I see two extremes presented by Ms. Jong... interesting that she would pass judgment on parents (professional narcissists). In the end, attachment still matters, parenting is important — whether it's a Mom, a Dad, or another Primary Caregiver, and fortunately — in the best interest of children, there are still rules. We must be careful endorsing statements such as "Do your best. There are no rules." As professional educators and caring members of our communities and society, we must insist there are a few rules. We must remain objective, supportive, sensitive, and responsive, as we support the maturation of our next generation. The generation we are nurturing will make decisions and choices as adults, based in part on how we supported them. I'll choose not to share today's article.
John Surr, Bethesda, Maryland:
Although there may not be any rules, attachment still matters enormously to a child's later development, and our culture tends to smother natural instincts to be in touch with and attuned to one's baby. There's no real substitute for a sensitive, responsive, loving caregiver, male or female, especially in a baby's first year. Our electronic and corporate age tends to draw us into our individual shells, but babies need our attention and interaction.
Macky Buck, Macky and Michael's house, Cambridge, Massachusetts:
She makes a good point, though it is hard to find in all the judgmental anger. In particular I object to the cruel words toward interracial adoption, and the fact that while a few people have always had children for their own purposes, the vast majority of us are working hard to do the right thing by them. But this raises an important point. Lately, as she says, we are in a challenging cul-de-sac of believing the mother is the end all and the be all key to parenting. It is not true, and has not been true. But there is a counter idea to the one that we are a species that always 'wore' our babies. Sarah Hrdy in her great book argues that humans are unique among the primate families in that we are the only species where someone other than an infant's mother can safely care for said infant. She contends that babies, with their early smiles and intense social bent, have facilitated this by charming others to pick them up and care for them, thus allowing the mother two hands for various tasks. She actually goes on to say that in this way babies themselves moved humanity forward. ... The world and its problems are multi-faceted. Never as simple as Erica Jong would have it, nor as diabolical either. We are complex; most of us are trying hard to do the right thing. We often just don't have a big enough picture. I know the woman who puts this together likes to read. Try out Sarah Hrdy's (yes it is spelled oddly!) great, readable book Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding. It is deep, well documented and very thought provoking.
Delivered five days a week containing news, success stories, solutions, trend reports, and much more.
ExchangeEveryDay is the official electronic newsletter for Exchange Press. It is delivered five days a week containing news stories, success stories, solutions, trend reports, and much more.
ABC and Beyond™, Hanen’s newest guidebook, brings to life the most current research on promoting children’s emergent literacy in early childhood classrooms, teaching educators not just what children should learn, but exactly how to help them learn it.
Comments (16)
Displaying 5 of 16 Comments [ View all ]North Harris College, Retired
Beaumont, Texas, United States
Most of us spend our lives seeking warm nurturing relationships with other people. But for babies, nurturance is not optional. They must have nurturance not only to survive but to develop and learn.
Babies are in the most vulnerable period of their lives physically. They are in the most malleable period of their lives emotionally and intellectually. If children are to reach their potential, families must give an enormous amount of early nurturing and communities must provide resources for support.
Erica Jong is absolutely correct in saying that having a baby inconveniences corporate moms. Committing to breastfeed and to "wear" an infant to support attachment clearly changes a mother's life for the first years of her child's life. Amazingly, many heroic working parents manage to make it happen because they want the very best for their child.
My hat's off to all the hard-working parents who lovingly get up with babies in the night and patiently chase toddlers around!
SPCCC, Inc.
Potsdam, NY, United States
I love reading books by Erica Jong. She is not afraid of controversy and is true to her own opinion. It will be a sad world for future generations if we cannot print reading material without prior permission to do so. I want to thank you for sharing her unique vision of motherhood for those of us with open minds and hearts. It was refreshing.
Cudahy, WI, United States
If you are only reading the exchange portion of this article you are missing the entire meaning of the author. Read the entire article before commenting.
California Early Childhood Mentor Program
San Francisco, CA, United States
Bravo to you, Roger, Bonnie & team, for keeping the field informed of the wide variety of research, insights, and opinions (enlightened or otherwise) available! The most valuable, I find, are those materials in non-ECE publications. We need to know what people outside the field are reading and hearing in order to best craft communications to the public. My recommendation to Dr. Honig: Send your passionate rebuttal to the Wall Street Journal!
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
I agree with your right to, and your reasons for, printing controversial articles, but I also think what we have come to see these daily emails as a resource for staying up-to-date in our child care programs and philosophies. So when an article that goes against so much of what we stand for comes across our desk, from a source we trust, it is hard to stay quiet. I personally would like a 'disclaimer' at the beginning of such an article to let us know when you are not sharing information that we should use or embrace. You would get less anger but more thought provoking reactions which I am sure you were hoping for.
Post a Comment