ExchangeEveryDay Past Issues
<< Previous Issue
|
View Past Issues | |
Next Issue >>
January 13, 2010
When you are enthusiastic about what you do, you feel this positive energy. It’s very simple.
-Paulo Coelho, Brazilian novelist
To say our field is diverse is a gross understatement. Early childhood professionals operate huge programs and tiny programs, for profit, non profit programs, and public programs. The profession includes staunch right-wingers and flaming left-wingers and every shade in between. When it comes to curriculum, our programs are just as diverse — ranging from the highly structured academic programs to totally unstructured play programs — again with every possible variation in between.
These differences have been exposed most dramatically of late around the debate of play versus academic programs. This peaked in 2008 when one in four participants in our annual Exchange Insta Poll on Threats identified "the push down of academics" as a major threat. As the economy worsened and other concerns peaked, only 12% shared academics as a prime threat in 2009, and in this year's Insta Poll on Threats, less than 10% see it that way.
However, a recent New York Times article, shared by several readers, "Studying Young Minds and How to Teach Them," will certainly ratchet up this debate. Here is a small excerpt:
"For much of the last century, educators and many scientists believed that children could not learn math at all before the age of five, that their brains simply were not ready. But recent research has turned that assumption on its head — that, and a host of other conventional wisdom about geometry, reading, language, and self-control in class. The findings, mostly from a branch of research called cognitive neuroscience, are helping to clarify when young brains are best able to grasp fundamental concepts.
"In one recent study, for instance, researchers found that most entering preschoolers could perform rudimentary division, by distributing candies among two or three play animals. In another, scientists found that the brain’s ability to link letter combinations with sounds may not be fully developed until age 11 — much later than many have assumed. The teaching of basic academic skills, until now largely the realm of tradition and guesswork, is giving way to approaches based on cognitive science... ".
The Exchange book, More Than Numbers: Mathematical Thinking in the Early Years, is a must-have resource for presenting mathematics to young children as a way of thinking through practical, hands-on experiences. This inspiring collection offers you a wealth of powerful insights and ideas.
What is ExchangeEveryDay?
ExchangeEveryDay is the official electronic newsletter for Exchange Press. It is delivered five days a week containing news stories, success stories, solutions, trend reports, and much more.
Comments (8)
Displaying 5 of 8 Comments [ View all ]United States
I can't let the week end without responding to the NY Times article, Studying Young Minds... "...teaching basic academic skills, now largely the realm of tradition and guesswork," "In a typical preschool class, children do very little math." and other observations of the author are insulting to early childhood educators who have been teaching and trusting young children to learn math, physics, geometry, science, architecture, etc. for many, many years. The work of Caroline Pratt who developed the unit block principle in the early 1900s; Mary Baratta-Lorton's Mathematics Their Way, written in the 1970s; and Constance Kamii's Young Children Reinvent Arithmetic, are just three examples of early childhood educators who knew that children's brains can grasp and act on sophisticated concepts when the environment is geared to their way of thinking. It's encouraging that cognitive neuroscience is supporting what many early childhood educators have known for decades. Children love learning and our jobs is to avoid putting unnecessary obstacles in their way.
United States
I am looking for my former Training Specialist Ms. Susan Speroff. We met in Vogelweh, Germany back in 2000. Your email address was ....elmendorf.af.mil, not working anymore. Last I heard from you, you were in Alaska. I would like to hear from you again.
EOrtiz
Westport Weston Cooperative Nursery School
Westport, CT, United States
I think that there is a lot of misinformation fueling the debate surrounding academic and play preschool programs. The author of the article reveals what all of us play based promoters have known all along: Young children can learn amazing levels of math, science, or any subject for that matter as long as it is put into a meaningful context for them. Describing the child's understanding of division by distributing candy to play animals is a prefect example. Had this same concept been presented in flashcard format or in a worksheet or other 'structured academic' format it would most likely have been lost on a young child. Those of us who advocate for children and play understand how to promote active learning by listening to children play and providing a meaningful context for understanding and learning.
Child Day Care Association
St. Louis, MO, United States
I spent 20+ years in a Montessori classroom - studying the philospohy and methodology of Dr. Maria Montessori, as well as observing the children's learning in the Prepared Environment. Children can most definitely grasp all four math operations during their preschool years. The key to success is presenting the concept when the child is ready for it, in a manner suited to the individual's learning style.
wheelock College
Lincoln, MA, United States
I think the "fear of academics" is not at all a desire to avoid teaching math, science, or reading to young children. On the contrary, the tests, the expectations of this push-down appear strongly related to innappropriate conceptualization of how to succeed in teaching the subject matter appropriately to the age group, and how to assure that children's curiosity and eagerness to figure out the meaning of what they observe turns into a continuing motivation to achieve.
Post a Comment