To subscribe to ExchangeEveryDay, a free daily e-newsletter, go to www.ccie.com/eed
|
"You gain strength, experience and confidence by every experience where you really stop to look fear in the face. You must do the thing you cannot do.
–Eleanor Roosevelt
REACTION TO BUSH PROPOSAL
ON AIDS
In his State of the Union address on 28 January, US President George Bush made
a dramatic commitment to provide $10 billion of new funding for AIDS over the
years 2004-2008, in addition to the $5 billion of expenditure already projected
for that period. While world wide reaction was enthusiastic, this story appearing
in Business Day (February 5, 2003) in South Africa offers some
concerns:
"President George Bush made a breakthrough in last week's state of the
union address by pledging $15bn of US support over the next five years to fight
AIDS in Africa and the Caribbean. The US commitment to increase its spending
by $10bn is the first time that an appropriate level of financial resources
has been put into the battle by either the US or Europe. But disappointment
comes in the fine print. The US, as is its wont these days, has decided to go
it alone. The new programme is designed to be run by US agencies rather than
going through the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB, and Malaria, the international
initiative that is best placed by far to achieve the global goals of curbing
the three pandemic diseases. Of the new US funding, only $1bn over five years
is to go through the Global Fund. It is now up to European nations to ensure
success in the scaled-up campaign against the killer diseases. They could do
so by matching the US financial commitment, and pulling the US back into the
fold within the Global Fund.
"As a recent convert to the war on AIDS, the US administration has latched
on to a simplistic vision of what to do, based on the example of a single country
-- Uganda. It knows little of the measures in place in different parts of the
world, and has not recognised that each country needs to shape the best local
response. It is here that the Global Fund plays an important role. The fund
is organised as a consortium of donors and recipient countries, civil society
and business. It is set up to encourage rigorous and sensible plans that meet
local needs. Specifically, the fund invites the leading stakeholders within
each recipient country to prepare a unified national plan. The fund builds on
an important recent insight of the European donor agencies, that support is
most effective when the donors pool their resources to support a single coherent
strategy -- known as a sector-wide approach. Otherwise, each country has to
grapple with 20 or more separate aid agencies, each with its own quirks, politics,
reporting requirements and tied aid. The US plan would undermine a sector-wide
approach by pushing AIDS control back to a scramble of individual donor projects."
To read this entire story as well as related stories, go to:
www.aidspan.org/gfo/archives/newsletter/issue7.htm
For more information about Exchange's magazine, books, and other products pertaining to ECE, go to www.ccie.com.
|
© 2005 Child Care Information Exchange - All Rights Reserved | Contact Us | Return to Site