To subscribe to ExchangeEveryDay, a free daily e-newsletter, go to www.ccie.com/eed
|
"Love is the greatest refreshment in life."
–Pablo Picasso
RESPONSE TO HEAD START
STORY
The February 6 edition of ExchangeEveryDay addressed the Bush
Administration's plans for Head Start. This story generated a great deal of
feedback from readers. Below we will share a sampling of readers' comments:
Marian Van Den Berg: I'm curious what the President thinks will happen
nationally when all these people that support and have careers in Head Start
become unemployed because of the transition from HHS to the Dept of Ed?.....Does
he really think that the Dept of Ed, with its faultering budget will employ
those now employed? What will happen to the core components of Head Start when
it passes to the Dept of Ed?.......The Dept of Ed cannot meet the needs of the
students it is now responsible for......And now we are going to trust it to
meet the needs of our most vulnerable (and valuable) students? I think we need
national attention on the importance of early childhood education.......A national
campaign that informs the public of the new neuroscience information and the
importance of those early first prenatal through 5 or 6 years........What a
shame for our President to pass the buck like this.......but then, didn't he
do that in Texas too?
Kirsten Haugen: As the Bush administration pushes for standardized assessment
of four year olds and increased "accountability," consider the following
statement from the NAEYC and NCTM (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics)
in their joint position statement on "Early Childhood Mathematics: Promoting
Good Beginnings" (2002):
"With the enormous variability in young children's development, neither
policymakers nor teachers should set a fixed timetable for children to reach
each specific learning objective. In addition to the risk of misclassifying
individual children, highly specific timetables for skill acquisition pose another
serious threat, especially when accountability pressures are intense. They tend
to focus teachers' attention on getting children to perform narrowly defined
skills by a specified time, rather than laying the conceptual groundwork that
will serve children well in the long run."
Rae Pica: If state governments are to be more responsible for Head Start
programs and funding, then I fear for the program here in New Hampshire. Not
only are we still without statewide public preschool or kindergarten; we're
also in the midst of a major education funding crisis. I don't believe for a
moment Head Start will be allotted the funds it needs -- here and in other financially-challenged
states
Jerry Parr: Have you seen the latest out of DOE? Man what a frenzy everyone
is in... and tribes have no idea what their future is since they are not even
acknowledged under the DOE plan... I think the quote that lead your email from
Helen Keller (intentionally or not) should become our mantra for this evolutionary
(revolutionary?) phase of head start's development... this is kind of like one
of those 70's movies where man takes on the dinosaurs... but without Raquel
Welch... alot of fosssil shaking going on.
For more information about Exchange's magazine, books, and other products pertaining to ECE, go to www.ccie.com.
|
© 2005 Child Care Information Exchange - All Rights Reserved | Contact Us | Return to Site